John Tran
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Media - Afraid to Report on Virginia Judicial Corruption -
The Media has admitted to being afraid to investigate the criminal Actions of
the Old Boy Network, the Judicial and Elected official in Virginia - What
happened to Nancy Dunning et al could happen to them or someone close to them
– So instead they have allowed for it to go unreported the Obstruction of
Justice, the Tampering with evidence, the Ex-Parte communications, the lying in
court, the lying in court documents and the lying in court documents to the
Supreme Court of Virginia – Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser will instead
of being held responsible will be allowed to retire early with full benefits
for the rest of her life with no regard to her responsibilities to the Citizens
of Virignia -



Wednesday, May 21, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA RECORD NO: ____110156 & 122204ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF: MOTION TO RE-OPEN DUE TO FRAUD ON THE COURT BY THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA FOR RULING AGAINST THEIR OWN LAWS AND ALLOWING LAWYERS TO BE DISENGENOUS IN COURT IN CIRCUIT COURT FILINGS AND SUPREME COURT FILINGS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA CASE # CH010654
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Appellant /
Plaintiff
v.
ILONA ELY FREEDMAN
GRENADIER HECKMAN Esq
And
GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO,
LTD,
And
DAVID MARK GRENADIER
Appellees / Defendants,
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF:
MOTION TO RE-OPEN DUE TO
FRAUD ON THE COURT BY THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA
FOR RULING AGAINST
THEIR OWN LAWS AND ALLOWING LAWYERS TO
BE DISENGENOUS IN COURT IN CIRCUIT COURT FILINGS AND SUPREME COURT FILINGS
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF
ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA
CASE # CH010654
September
5, 2007 -
Filed with the Alexandria Circuit Court a Motion for Reinstatement of the Bill
of Complaint of 28 E Bellefonte Ave Partnership. The notification to the
parties to be served through the Sheriff’s office. The court date for the Motion was on September
12, 2007.
September 12, 2007 -
Motions Day Judge Kloch hears the case.
This resulted in the Filing of the Motion for Default filed on September
21, 2007. As the Motion for Default goes
into more detail Mrs. Grenadier was disingenuous in court claiming she hadn’t
been served. But, she couldn’t have
known of the court date unless she was served.
She admitted in court to Judge Kloch that David Grenadier’s attorney Mr.
Michael Weiser was aware of the court date because she had faxed the
information to him. Judge Kloch kept
passing it over to give Mr. Weiser the chance to show up. He then sent a clerk down to the Sheriff’s
office who then came back and according to Judge Kloch said that
Ms. Ilona Grenadier nor Mr. Weiser had been served according to their
(the Sheriff’s) records. I explained to
the Judge the only way Mrs. Grenadier could be there was if she was
served. Mrs. Ilona Grenadier admitted to
having the information and faxing it to Mr. Weiser. At which point he dismissed everything to be
re-heard. Mrs. Grenadier a lawyer had not been
telling the truth when she said she hadn’t been served
After Court Appellant went down to the Sheriff’s office. Appellant was given a copy of Mrs.
Grenadier’s service. Mr. Weiser’s papers
were not in the box, and as his office is basically the same building they
couldn’t say whether he had been served or not.
September
21, 2007 - JWG filed for the Motion for Default, and The
Motion to Reinstate (just in case) for October 10, 2007. - Motion for Default filed (written by federal
Judge in DC)
October
10, 2007 – All the Alexandria Judges have recused
themselves from hearing it and they need to bring in an impartial Judge. This
is the start of shopping for Judges that would rule in favor of Appellees. Even when Ilona would brag afterwards about
her relationship with the Judge and how he had called her when he was
practicing law and she would help him out
October
17, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske – After informing Plaintiff
that the Judges had recuse themselves she would be finding Judge’s to hear the
case. Judge Frank A. Hoss was available
for November 28, 2007 at 10.00 am. At the time of this letter the Judges were:
1.
Judge
Donald M. Haddock – We learned in the Spring of 2008 he had recused himself
from hearing the case.
- Judge John E. Kloch – Ilona had lied to him in court on September 5, 2007 – He could have heard the Motion for Default as he knew the truth – Recused himself with letter of apology and Statement Appellant deserved a fair hearing and that “The appearance of Justice was just as important as Justice itself”
- Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler – Her Father was our pediatrician for Appellants girls, David had gone to Hebrew School with her, His father and her father weregood friends/Appellant had shown her and her husband Real Estate.
November
15, 2007 – Letter from Diane Fiske that the Motions Date had been
changed to Wednesday, December 5, 2007 @ 10.00 am - this had been filed on September 21, 2007
– Is now being heard on December 5, 2007.
Where most Motions are heard 7 days later this took 2.1/2 months to be
heard. By all appearance due to the need
of shopping for a Judge.
The three (3) attached letters
from Diane Fiske court administrator shows the City of Alexandria Circuit Court
did not make a mistake. The actions of the City of Alexandria
Circuit Court were knowingly and
malicious to shop for Judges that would Rule in favor of attorney Ilona
Grenadier Heckman. That Judge
Hoss from Prince William County had in 1990 recused himself from hearing any
cases that involved Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
By all appearance he knew it was inappropriate for him to hear this
case. The Order on page 4 in the Motion to Re-Open due to the Fraud on the
Court is signed by Judge Hoss of Prince William County. That once Judge Hoss by all appearance
recused himself a 2nd time. The
Judge’s in the Circuit Court cannot say any longer a mistake was made. The Judge’s in the Circuit Court of
Alexandria knew exactly what they were doing.
That they knew of the Supreme Court rule Supreme Court Rule
§17.1-105(B) and chose
not to follow the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. Attached find Letters:
Dated: October 17, 2007, November 15, 2007
That pertain to Judge Frank Hoss who had
recused himself back in 1990 and by all appearance recuses himself again.
Dated:
May 13, 2008 sent just a few days after Chief Judge
Haddock explains to Appellant “You
will never get a fair Trial “WE LOVE ILONA””
These letters expose the
collusion of the Circuit Court Judges in the State of Virginia – FRAUD ON THE
COURT – TREASON on the Court. This by all appearance shows the disingenuous
behavior of the Supreme Court of Virginia in ignoring their own Rules and Laws
to protect one of their own.
December
5, 2007 - Judge
Thomas A. Fortkort. Denied
Appellants Motion for Default. It should be noted the Motion for Default was a suggestion & outlined by a Federal Judge from DC.
December
2007 - Appellant Asked Diane Fiske Several times
about a Fair Judge – she informs Appellant the only way anyone else (Supreme Court
chose’s Judge) Is if they can’t find one.
Which is incorrect – the rule is the complete opposite –
in accordance with §17.1-105(B):
Learn of June of 2010
If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case.
If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case.
February 8, 2008 ~ Appellant receives a Letter From Ilona Grenadier (on her law firm
stationary) to Janice Wolk Grenadier,
Ilona Grenadier asserts ownership of 75% of a property Known as 28 East
Bellefonte Ave, Alexandria, VA 22305.
Plaintiff also felt threatened by the letter which is full of misleading
and deceitful statements.
February
13,2008 – Judge Brown
hears Motions * Ilona is not in
court Heather Jenquien represented her.
Motions to compel ~
February
26, 2008 – Filed with Clerk of Courts following letter: Because keep in mind all Judge’s had recuse
themselves and all Motions had to go through Diane Fiske as she needed to shop
for a judge or it had to be on a day
they had a visiting Judge.
The letter asks Ilona for dates to get back to Diane
Fiske to file a Motion as no Motion’s could be filed without everyone’s ageing
on the date before Diane found a Judge.
February 27, 2008 - Ilona Grenadier filed on February 27, 2008
with the Circuit Court of The City of Alexandria an Answer to The Amended Bill
of Complaint claiming 75% ownership of the property at 28 East Bellefonte Ave.,
Alexandria, VA 22305 which is a documented lie. Most of Ilona Grenadiers
statements in the Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint were disingenuous
which Plaintiff has supplied documentation to VSB for the purpose of
establishing the truth. The following
are the lies Ilona Grenadier Filed with the Circuit Court of Alexandria
1.
75%
ownership
2.
That plaintiff has provided no proof of
actual payment for expenses ~ provided 3 times to defendants
3.
Plaintiff’s Bankruptcy caused by Bellefonte
as Plaintiff in & out ~ Which now Plaintiff realizes she would never had
been in and out if it wasn’t for the manipulation and lies of Ilona Grenadier
4.
4 times Ilona ~ “Defendant, Ilona Ely
Grenadier, denies that Plaintiff owns or owned 50%of East Bellefonte.
The
document on Februaary 27, 2008 by Ilona Ely Grenadier a lawyer was rattled with
Lies ~ The VSB ~ The Judges in
Alexandria and her good friend ~ Judge Brown had no problem with that.
This can be backed up with
information/documentation from Admission statements from Ilona Grenadier which
had several conflicting statements. The
amount of money Ilona Grenadier put into the property can be established by an
accounting done by Ilona Grenadier. The Accounting shows the 25% down payment
that was contributed in the purchase of the Bellefonte Property. The documents that were filed with the Motion
for Default in the Circuit Court of Alexandria can be used to verify the amount
of ownership Ilona Grenadier had. Ilona
Grenadier had in her possession the documents which showed her ownership at the
time she filed the pleadings. Those
pleadings were disingenuous and misleading when filed with The Circuit Court of
Alexandria.
March
5, 2008
– File 2nd Motion for Default – to be heard March 12, 2008 for the
following reasons:
- For all the reasons as stated in Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2007
- For all the untruths told in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint filed on February 27, 2008.
- For the letters Defendant sent bulling, threatening attached to the February Response to Ilona Ely Grenadier/GIC Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint / From February 8, 2008.
- For the non response to letters to try and set a new date for depositions or to set a trial date.
March
5, 2008 – Filed Motion to Change Date for: Notice of Deposition and to Set Date for
Trial – As Defendants would not respond to any correspondence.
March
11, 2008 – Plaintiff files – Praecipe ~ Remove Motions for March 12 no visiting Judges.
- Clerk of the Court will please remove from the docket on March 12, 2008 Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadiers Motion to Compel as there isn’t a visiting judge available to hear it.
- This again show’s that the Circuit Court Judge’s had recused themselves. That Plaintiff though out the case voiced her concern on getting a fair Trial. To the deaf ears of the Circuit Court of Alexandria who took the Arrogant view of doing whatever they wanted to do.
April
30, 2008 – Parcipe
re-file to have Motion for Default heard
as Diane Fiske has found a date that works for the Judge’s of Alexandria to find a Judge of there choice – for May 7, 2008
May
7, 2008 – Motions heard by Judge Brown – Ilona after court
informs me after he has ruled in her favor allowing her to file false papers as
an attorney in the Alexandria Circuit Court of law What
good friends she and Judge Brown are – and how he called her all the time for
legal advice.
May
7, 2008 After Court ~
1. Iloan
Grenadier again brags about her relationship with the Judge’s - That she has in
the past & continues to give Free legal advice to Judge Brown.
2. Ilona
Grenadier explains to me why no one has anything do to with my children is
because I raised them Catholic. In 19
years she has seen the girls once by her choice.
3. That
I should be grateful to her for the listing on Holland Road.
4. That
she doesn’t believe David Stold the money from Sonia Grenadier’s Trust - which
only left Ilona Grenadier and her law firm to steal the most likely over
$95,000.00
5. I
introduce myself to Judge Haddock after he speaks with Ilona – he explains to
me “I could never get a fair trial as they all Love Ilona” I turn to Diane Fiske shocked by the
statement and express I can’t believe he just said that to me.
6. Again
I ask Diane Fiske about getting Judge’s that aren’t friends of Ilona’s.
May
13, 2008 – Letter from Diane P Fiske that the case would be
heard by Judge John J. McGrath. This
letter show’s the following Judge’s in the letter head:
- Donald M. Haddock
- John E. Kloch (Retired) which means at the time Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Kloch and Judge McGrath were working together.
- Lisa Bondareff Kemler
June
18, 2010 – Plaintiff Files:
- Motion for Default - Ilona has lied in the Admissions
A. For
Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch on September 12, 2007 ~ Motion for Default
B. For
Motion for Default filed in February for Lying in the Answer to Bill of
Complaint by defendant and Counter claim and Cross Complaint
C. For
lies in Admissions
D. For
the letters Defendant sent Bulling & Threatening Plaintiff if Plaintiff
didn’t drop suit.
- Motion for Trial by Jury – Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & Ilona Grenadier
A.
Judge Haddock telling Plaintiff she
could never get a fair trial as they all “LOVE” Ilona
B.
Ilona informing Plaintiff all the Judges
were friends of hers & she gave them free legal advice when they called her
July
2, 2008 – Motion to be heard July 9, 2008 to include:
- Motion for Trial by Jury
- Motion to Compel
- Motion for Default
July
9, 2008 – Judge Howe Brown – rules :
- Denies motion for Default
- Denies motion for Trial by Jury
- And makes both sides work on response’s in the Motion to Compel
Spring
of 2008
Diane Fiske again advices Plaintiff
the only way anyone else would choose a Judge was if they couldn’t find
one then it would go to the Supreme Court and they would then choose the
Judge. Which was incorrect. The minute in September of 2007 when the
Judge’s had recuse themselves is when the Supreme Court should have been
choosing the Judge’s not the Judge’s themselves or Diane Fiske should have been
choosing the Judge. The Head Judge -
Judge Haddock was talking and hugging Ilona while I was talking with Diane
Fiske about Fair Judge’s that were arms length.
When Ilona left I turned to Judge Haddock and introduced myself which he
then went onto inform me “ I wouldn’t
get a fair trial because they all “Loved
Ilona” “. Judge Haddock is the Head
Judge at the Alexandria Circuit Court. I
then turned to Diane Fiske – in shock – and said I can’t believe Judge Haddock
just told me “I would never get a Fair Trial because they loved Ilona”.
September 11,
2008 – Thursday “Kangaroo Court “ with Judge John McGrath
(Exhibit 11 - Judge McGrath)
September
22, 2008 – Monday - File
Motion for Reconsideration With new evidence that had been dropped off at
Appellants house - A letter that David Ellsberg the Settlement attorney for
Bellefonte had me write him that showed I was loaning the money to Ilona / David / GIC
October
21, 2008 – Mailed from Alexandria Virginia a complaint against
Judge John McGrath to his good friend Donald Curry w/ the JIRC Commission.
October
23, 2008 – Donald R Curry Counsel for JIRC sends Appellant the following( after telling
Appellant on the phone not to bother with a complaint :
“This is in response to your complaint dated October 21,
2008. Based upon what you have submitted
and alleged, we have found no basis for a conclusion that there has been a
violation of the Canons. A mere “belief”
that an ex parte communication occurred, without more, does not provide a
sufficient basis for Commission action.
Please be advised, moreover, that the judge about whom you complaint is
a retired judge from the 26th Circuit. “
October
27, 2008 - Fax to Randy Sengel with copy of Complaint and
response to JIRC Commission. How out
rages it was. – His suggestion was I
address members directly.
November
12, 2008 – Reached out to each member of the Courts of Justice by
Phone or Fax –
- Judge Larry D. Willis
- Honorable Virginia L. Cochran
- James F. Fisher Esq
- William I Fitzgerald
- Judge Cleo E. Powell
- Olivia A. Welsh
- Kenneth Motero 804-786-6634 - Boss to Donald Curry
- Tim Kaine - Governors’ office 804-786-2211
- Bob McDonnel - Attorney General 804-786-2071
- Donald Curry – General Assembly
- Department of Human Resources Mgt 804-225-2131
Carol Supreme court - HR
Virginia House of Delegates – Courts of Justice
1. Dave Albo – Chair
2.
Pamela Burham
Virginia Senate –
- Henry L. Marsh III – Chair – Contact Comm operations (804) 698-7450
Delegate - Alexandria
- David Englin – 804-698-1045 703-549-3203
Senator
- Patsy Ticer 804-698-7530 703-549-5770 Spoke with detail to Peggy Fax# 703-739-6761 - Gave me Mr Henry Marsh’s number - information
Congress
- James Moran
November
12, 2008 – Fax to Henry Marsh – Jackie Parker copy of complaint
November
12, 2008 – Fax to Dave Albo after horrid conversation. J
November
12, 2008 – Fax Donald Curry adding letter date May 8, 2008 that
Ilona had written to me, that Judge McGrath had used in making his decision on
this little meeting prior to court.
Which in 45 minutes he would never had found in a file that was about 8
– 10 inches in paper work.
November
13, 2008 –Letter from Donald Curry that the letter I had sent
didn’t change his mind that there should be an inquiry into Judge John McGrath.
November
13, 2008 – letter from Henry L. Marsh lll - He referred me to The Chief Justice of the
Virginia Supreme Court as he was in charge of Substitute Judges. – Chief
Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. 100
North Ninth street, Richmond, Va 23219.
December
8, 2008 - Fax info to
Donald Curry he is of no help
December
8, 2008 – Calls to Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr.
requesting a meeting – spoke with Chief Deputy clerk – Leslie David to put
complaint in writing.
December
10, 2008 – Letter from Donald Curry they are not looking at my
complaint
December
18, 2008 – Reach out to John McGrath to get him to do the right
thing – no word back From the letter – Pleading with him to do the right thing
and reconsider the Motion for Reconsideration or at least be respectful and
look at the new evidence. Sent him
several e-mails giving him more evidence and do to the right thing.
December
18, 2008 – I learn from the internet that Judge John Kloch is now
working with Judge john McGrath Jr. with a firm called Judicial Solutions’ PC
*In Letter from Judge John Kloch –Which even makes this more of a conflict of
interest. Not an arms length
situation. If it isn’t enough to have
the Commonwealth’s Attorney tell you Judge John McGrath has done a lot of work
in the Alexandria Courts.
July 28,2008 1st Complaint ~ Virginia Bar Complaint Outline / Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman VSB Docket # 09-NAT-076104
- That Ilona lied in court on September 12, 2007 All facts can be found in the Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2009 Which a copy was sent in with the complaint
- Letter from Mrs. Grenadier suggesting I had better drop the suit Dated February 8, 2008
- Ilona presented false statements in her Counter Claim and Cross Complaint which can be proven through her own documentation. These false statements were filed and are in Court Record.
August 4, 2008 Appellant received a letter from Mr. James C. Bodie
saying they would not be taking action against Ilona. Appellant then did pursue it and asked them
to review it again after sending in more information. I was also turned down on the review. I was basically told because Ilona wished for
a different outcome her behavior was acceptable to the Virginia Bar.
September
11, 2008 – Court Date
A. Conference
in Judges Chambers – Only Ilona & Janice didn’t include David
B. Judge
Kloch hanging outside the door
C. Sonia
Grenadier Trust – brought up in opening By Ilona & David and I was
questioned about it by Ilona
D. Judge
McGrath – Won’t let me bring up Sonia Grenadier Trust & Doesn’t understand
it – won’t take time to understand
E. Judge
– Warns me on how I question Ilona
F. David
Grenadier lies under oath – move on per Judge
G. Judge
McGrath & Judge Kloch had a very friendly Lunch at Jackson 20
7. September
2008 – File Reconsideration with new evidence that had been dropped off at my
house.
8. September
24, 2008 - Diane hears back from Judge
McGrath – doesn’t want to see new evidence or any Exhibits – Faxed to him – never seeing Exhibits
immediately Denies
9. Randy
Sengel – Commonwealth’s Attorney – Informs me that Judge McGrath has done a lot
of work in Alexandria Circuit Court
10. JIRC Commission – Donald Curry good friend to
Judge McGrath was raised in Arlington
11. Alexandria
Circuit Court – Yes McGrath is from Harrisonburg – But, has several ties to
Alexandria & is working w/ Judge Kloch – guess they just didn’t think that
was important
12. File
complaints w/JIRK Commission of course I didn’t have all the information and
Donald Curry who make’s decision is friends w/ everyone
April 29, 2009 ~ Virginia
Bar Complaint #2
With the first Complaint Ilona had broken the Ethics rule on Knowingly
Filing false information with the courts, making false statements in Court,
recording documents along with Admissions statements that were disingenuous,
and lying in Court. She now had broken
the Ethics Rule 1.16 (d) and (e) by refusing to give me the NOTE that she as my
lawyer had written and had insisted on being the only one to hold on to it.
I attached much evidence on this complaint of Ilona
being very disingenuous. With all her statements she made and how she mislead
all the other attorneys with the truth of the amount of funds that were stolen
from the Sonia Grenadier Trust. I have
also shown how she personally financially benefited from all of these actions,
my millions of dollars in Real Estate.
*** These complaints by my understanding from Mr.
Edward L. Davis have been combined and looked at together.
***Appellant feels from his letter he doesn’t even understand the
complaints nor is he looking at the evidence that has been provided to show
that Ilona is lying.
*** An attorney
who teaches Ethics for the VSB helped Appellant to write complaint
July 2009 _ Letter Chief
Justice Supreme Court of Virginia
June 21, 2010 -
Letter to Patricia L. Harrington – Supreme Court Clerk
August
2010 Virginia Attorney – Calls Diane Fiske – she
confirms all the Judge’s in The Alexandria Circuit Court had recuse themselves
July
2010
Janice Confirms the Rule with the Supreme Court
July
12, 2010 e-mail
to Defendants that Plaintiff was filing Motion for Default to be heard on
September 21, 2010 – to be heard on July 28, 2010
July
13, 2010 – File Motion
July
26, 2010 w/ 4 min left Michael Wieser files he can’t be there –
in collusion with Judge’s by all appearance and ex-parte communications
July
20, 2010 – Ilona files Opposition – weren’t we supposed to be in
court on the 28th ? when she knew
August
4, 2010 – After being reprimanded by the Circuit Court about
contacting everyone – being treated rudely now every time I call by the
Alexandria Circuit Court – file Motion to be heard on August 11, 2010
August
11, 2010 – Judge Kloch –
visiting Judge
August
11, 2010 – Plaintiff is informed my The Circuit Court they will
not take her phone calls or any messages from her
August
12, 2010 – Plaintiff receives an e-mail - Judge Kloch – Decides
to recluse himself – works with Judge McGrath
- Quote from Judge Kloch’s letter “I believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally important as justice itself” How disingenuous Judge Kloch can be
January 20, 2011 - JWG Appeal to
Supreme Court ~ Record # 110156
May 24, 2011 ~
Supreme Court Oral Argument by Janice Wolk Grenadier pro-se JWG Oral Argument
January
20 JWG Supreme Court Appeal Filed
February
2 IEG Letter Ben Dimuro Give notice file dismiss of Petition for
Appeal
3 IEG Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss
Petition for Appeal
8 JWG Petitioner’s Response to Respondents Joint
Motion to Dismiss Petition
For Appeal
10 IEG
Joint Brief in Opposition to Petition for Appeal
May
4 Supreme Court of Va Letter to JWG May 24, 2011 Oral Argument
24 JWG Oral Argument in Richmond
June
20?
Supreme Court Deny
Petition – Ruling against their own Law
27
JWG Petition for Rehearing
September 2011
20? Supreme Court Deny Petition for Rehearing
21 JWG
Letters to Brown - McGrath - Fortkort - Dawkins - Haddock
-
That Appellant planed on suing them
27 JWG
Letter Sengel & Haddock for
Grand Jury
29 Sengel
Letter to JWG no Grand Jury
October 2011
JWG Files Precipe to be heard in front of Regular
Grand Jury Oct 11, 2011
5 Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel Letter to JWG no not going to let me in
front of Regular Grand Jury
6 JWG
letter to Sengel
6 JWG
letter to Ed Semonian – Clerk of Court of the City of Alexandria
7 Sengel
e-mail receipt of letter and sent Ed Semonian his letter
11 Refused Grand Jury
14 JWG
Letter to Judge Haddock
14 Sengel
Letter Judge Haddock retires end of December 31, 2011
20 JWG
files in the Eastern District Court of Virginia
Complaint-Conspiracy to
interfere with the Civil Rights 18 USC 241 & 42 USC 1983 Illegal Actions to
Deny Access to Grand Jury. Trial by
Jury. & More Emergency Motion for
injunctive Relief
31 JWG
Letter to Judge Lee
November
2011
9 Fed Court
Order Deny Request for in forma Pauperis due to claim is Frivolous
16 Letter from the Circuit Court of Alexandria that the Supreme Court had conflicts with the
date of December 12, 2011 due to schedule conflicts.
21 Supreme
Court Letter Judge Potter to sit on
Grand Jury of February 13, 2011
21
Order from the Supreme Court for Judge Potter to assist Alexandria Circuit
Court
23 JWG
Files with Fed Court
Petition for
Reconsideration of the “ Frivolous” Order of 9 November 2011
Complaint~Conspiracy to Interfere with the Civil Rights 18 USC 241 & 42 ISC
1983 Illegal Actions to Deny Access to Grand Jury Trial By Jury
** Janice -
Learns about the Majesty can also bring charges - Calls City of Alexandria Majesty to learn that
he requires a Police Report - Janice
then calls Detective Pak to ask for Police Report #
Janice Calls Records in
Alexandria to learn - There is no Police
Report # for the Extortion investigation brought on by Randy Sengel
commonwealth’s attorney which there is a letter from Ben DiMuro April 16, 2009
charging Appellent with acts of Extortion.
Appellant now knows of the Collusion between Randy Sengel - Ben DiMuro
to stop Appellant.
December
20 Ms. Slaughter Federal Judge Bruce
Lee’s Secretary lies to Appellant
21 File Motion to be heard in Federal Court
January 6, 2012 - denied as Judge Lee is
out of town?
22 File in the Supreme Court of Virginia - Petition for Writ of Error Coram Vobis ~
Alexandria Court Illegal Actions to Deny Citizen Right to Trial by Jury and
Grand Jury
January 2012
4 Letter Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney to
Judge Potter informing him to refuse JW in front of the Grand Jury as Appellant
is not one of his witness’s
JW
contacts Supreme Court regarding letter and informed anyone can wright to a
Judge from a
4 Letter from Meghan S. Roberts threatening me
with legal action over $200. For infractions of code a gutter & RV parked
in my driveway. Collusion with Randy
Sengel in attempt to Scare JW.
7 Letter JW to Meghan S.Roberts no intention
of paying and reason why
18 Motion for sanctions against Randy Sengel
commonwealth attorney for letter to Judge Potter
18
Pracipe to be heard on January 25, 2012
20
Letter from Law Clerk Circuit Court of Alexandria that my Motion for Sanctions
against Mr. Sengel would be heard by Judge Potter
February
2012
1 Motion
filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions about Grand
Jury - Since Alexandria has shown in the
past not to follow the rules of the courts It was reasonable for JW to ask
basic questions which he refused to answer.
Most likely he doesn’t know the basic rule
2 Parecipe
filed on Feb 1 for Motion to be heard on
February 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clark who had not recused himself
from hearing this case.
2 Letter Circuit Court of Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be heard
at 9am February 13, 2012
13 The kidnapping of JWG in court room 4 from
the Grand Jury Final Order by Judge
Richard Potter - Denied in front
of the Grand Jury he and Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney are now the Gate
Keepers of the Grand Jury
The Circuit Court of
Alexandria after leading Appellant on since October 11, 2012 wasted Appellants time and others with a Micky Mouse / Kangaroo type hearing on February 13, 2011 -
CONCLUSION
Judge
Potter should never have been chosen by the Supreme Court of Virginia. The actions of the Supreme Court are very
clear. That the Treason on the
Courts by the Supreme Court of Virginia, Judge’s and the Judge’s they supervise
were willful acts
that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and
grossly reckless against Appellant. That
Appellant has demonstrated through all her filings that Appellant understands
Justice and has every intention of being treated as an equal. Appellant complains
against all:
That
the State of Virginia should be held responsible for the actions of the
collusion of the roles the following agencies of the State were in collusion to
prevent Plaintiff’s Constitutional right to Due Process – City of Alexandria, Circuit Court Judges,
Commonwealth Attorney, State Police, The Legislature of Virginia, City of
Alexandria Police, VSB, JIRC all Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice The
Honorable Cynthia D. Kinser Appellant learned from Loretta Miller et al of her
being Jewish and by all appearance from the blog that she also was in collusion
because of Plaintiff / Appellant being Catholic. This was new evidence to Plaintiff/ Appellant. Circuit
Court Hon. Lisa Bondareff Kemler, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge Plaintiff/ Appellant has been aware all along this defendant was
Jewish. That her last signed Order was
irrational and Treason on the Court.
With a very heavy heart Plaintiff/
Appellant has to look at the
facts and realize part of the motivation
is because Appellant is Catholic. Her actions in
October of 2012 returning documents that had been filed in Court, to prevent
the Truth and the accounting of what Ilona Grenadier Heckman was responsible to
Plaintiff / Appellant was
Treason on the Court. All
actions will show to have been willful acts that were and are malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. The State of Virginia Attorney’s General
along was aware of these actions and refused to give the state police the power
to investigate. That when Attorney fees are awarded to attorneys with more
billable hours to Judge’s Chambers then to their clients and such bills were
found acceptable to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The State of
Virginia’s Treason on the Courts by
Judges, attorneys and their representatives will show to have been willful acts that were and are
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. Justice is supposed to be blind. In Bullock v. United
States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud upon
the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is
not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.
... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or
influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have
been directly corrupted." But not only are trial judges required
to be fair and impartial, they must also 'satisfy’ the appearance of justice
and this includes the Supreme Court of Virgina.
The trial judge's 'appearance,' or conduct and behavior, appearance of
bias alone is grounds for reversal even if the trial judge is, in fact,
completely impartial.
The
slippery slope that would open up the truth of how Plaintiff since October of 1985 had been manipulate and
that the actions were and are still willful acts that are malicious, violent, oppressive,
fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
The Law is very clear that the Judges who have acted by ruling in Favoritism
and Cronyism and not by the Rules of the Supreme Court. “Any judge who does not comply with his oath
to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and
engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully
comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124
U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act
or acts of treason.” “U.S.
v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406
(1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed
257 (1821)”
Plaintiff
is aware of and understands the difficulties for any Judge in this case. But, the law has been abused and broken by
the State of Virginia’s judicial system and Plaintiff will be able to show this
is not a unique situation but, normal practice in the State of Virginia. The difference is they have not been able to
kill Plaintiff or break Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff prays this court look at the evidence in documents and gives
Plaintiff the right to be heard. “No
man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law
may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government
from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey
it.” Butz
v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S.
at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)” “Further
it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the
Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and
Constitution of the United States as well.”
“State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to
safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428
US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)” “Whenever any officer of the court commits
fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in “fraud upon the
court”.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),
The
Constitution of the United States A fundamental, guarantee that all legal
proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings
and an opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one's
life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall
not be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or
capricious.
The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in the
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels
of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic
constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment
restricts the powers of the federal government and applies only to actions by
it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868,
declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law" (§ 1). This clause limits the powers
of the states, rather than those of the federal government.
Plaintiff can show harm and the harm that has forever been done to
her from the actions of the above Defendants.
Plaintiff may not have put all information in the best order – but, has
done the best she can do. She has done
it with a pure heart and honest way and still has not had her day in court to
be heard. Plaintiff has still had not had due
process Boddie
v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971), was a case before the United States Supreme Court giving the right to due process and to be heard. Appellant files the following Claims with the
right to add additional:
Claim 1
Breach
of Contract – Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing – Breach of
Contractual Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
By virtue of the facts stated above,
defendants have violated their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing.
Plaintiff has paid fees to these courts and not received Due Process.
1.
The above defendants and defendant’s
representatives breached their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing
when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism.
When Judge’s did not have Jurisdiction and chose friends/other Judges
who would not follow the rules but would rules as told.
2.
That
the above defendants and State Breach of Contract includes not limited to their
involvement being disingenuous in
documents filed with the courts and Orders. The documents will speak for
themselves the defendants were aware of these breaches as lawyers and Judges.
3.
Plaintiff through implied covenant of good
faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the Rules of the Courts.
4.
The
defendant’s “flagrantly violated” their Fiduciary responsibility to the
Judicial System and Plaintiff to deal in
Good Faith while Plaintiff continued to deal in Good Faith. The actions will be proven factually
by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the court and other. That the
constitutional Right of Due Process has been denied time and time again.
Claim
2
Violation Title 42 § 1983 Civil Rights Statue
Civil Rights
Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245
Defendants used unfair/unconscionable means to try
and intimitad and scare Plaintiff – They have acted as the Klue Klux Klan would
have in the past. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show that
Plaintiff can prove each element of alleged facts in her claims. That to seek
relief for the violation of a person’s Federal and Constitution rights under
Title 42 § 1983 it allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United
States Constitution as defined by Federal Law.
Plaintiff has been discriminated
against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245
prevents discrimination due to Religion
That this is a Hate Crime and “Hate crime laws are colorblind” Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld
hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S.
476(1993) involved a white victim.
Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being
black balled by the Old Boy’s Network / Judicial Community due to her x-husband
being the son of the late Judge Albert
Grenadier whom was the Husband to Defendant Ilona a lawyer who has also
intervened into Defendants Divorce. That
the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a
member of one that is considered by others
inferior to the other.
Claim
3
Consumer
Protection Act
The State of
Virginia was paid for serves in the Court that were denied Plaintiff because
she was Catholic. That the discrimination and
segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is
considered by others inferior to the
other.
Claim 4
Breach of Fiduciary
Duty
Unjust Enrichment/Constructive
Trust
That the State of Virginia had a
Fiduciary Duty to insure the rights and safety of Plaintiff in the and through
the Court system. Plaintiff
has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory – that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH” which is an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you
needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it
was published “with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not”
. “Fairness
of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our
system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of
unfairness. “In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)” Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil
rights decision
of the United States Supreme Court against
discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judge’s,
lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a
part of or one of them.
Claim
5
Common
Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972
.On several occasions Plaintiff
asked the courts to review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to look
into the allocations of misconduct.
Plaintiff was to go in front of the Grand Jury with her witness’s – But,
instead was kidnapped in a different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed
prior to her being allowed into ask for the Special Grand Jury..
Claim 6
Negligence
– the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional infliction of
emotional distress
The
defendant’s had a legal duty to use reasonable care in statements posted on the
internet about Plaintiff. They did not
do this. They have posted several lies
about Plaintiff and others. They have
done ruined Plaintiff reputation and should be held financially and legally
responsible for their actions.
The defendant’s malicious actions caused great
emotional distress to Plaintiff. By the
Commonwealth Attorneys orders of the City of Alexandria police to never take a
complaint from Plaintiff? Plaintiff has been harmed by the false
statements which are considered defamatory – that Plaintiff has “ THE TRUTH”
which is an absolute defense .
That the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to
protect Freedom of the press. The 1964
case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by
establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was
wholly and patently false or that it was published “with reckless disregard of
whether it was false or not”. Plaintiff
has been put into an unfair and dangerous position to protect herself and her
girls.
The actions of the actors to cause this emotional
distress were malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
Claim 7
Constructive
Fraud
The
defendants were deceptive of
material misrepresentations of past and existing facts and remained silent when
a duty to speak existed.
The defendant’s actions were Arbitrary and
Capricious absence of a rational connection between the facts found and the
choice’s made, made choices that were not in accordance with the law.
Claim 8
Civil Conspiracy
The
Collusion of the Defendants actions show collusion to harm Plaintiff from and
was done with
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless
intentions.
Defendants Civil
Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of
process, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
Civil conspiracy to
commit injurious falsehood with jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that Plaintiff has a “protected
characteristic” which will be proven as
to why Plaintiff was sought out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff
was targeted by Defendants
Defendants were in
collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional distress.
Claim 9
The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the
Bill of Rights
Plaintiff will prove a violation of
Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the
Four Basic freedoms are
being Violated -
The Four
Freedoms
Plaintiff
will show the actions of the Defendants were actions that were willful acts
were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly
reckless That the defendants were acting
under the color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due
process are factual allegations that will be proven through documents, letters,
e-mails and actions of defendants. That
defends had been given notice, and this court is aware of with the threat from
Defendant Ilona’s attorney.
This court should move swiftly and that a Grand Jury
should be instructed to have a Special Grand Jury look into the Criminal
Actions of all involved. That Sanctions
and the demand to make Appellant whole financially for all her lose and because
these actions were and still are willful acts that were and are malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. Appellant should be awarded appropriate
damages for the actions of all involved and the claims for laws ignored and
maliciously not followed .
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Pro se Appellant
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
202-368-7178
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE
Pursuant to Rule 5:17, I
hereby certify that
The appellant is Janice
Wolk Grenadeir pro se
The appellee is Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Esquire &
Grenadier Investment Co Ltd was represented by Grenadier, Anderson, Starace
& Duffett till around May of 2010
the following counsel started representing Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman, Esq and Grenadier Investment Co Ltd
Dimuro Ginsburg PC
John Tran Esquire
Benard J. Dimuro, Esquire
908 King Street Suite 200
Alexandria, Virginia, 22314
703-684-4333
The
appellee is David Mark Grenadier represented by:
Michael J. Weiser, Esquire
510 King Street Suite 416
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
A copy of this Motion was mailed to the Clerk
of the Supreme Court of Virginia on April 30, 2014 e-mailed and mailed to
counsel for Appellees.
.
This 30th day of April 2014
Janice Wolk Grenadier
As John F Kennedy said “The cost of freedom is always high, but
Americans have always paid it. And one
path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or submission”
and “There are risks and costs to action.
But, they are far less than the long range risks of comfortable inaction”

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)